Not Good Works or Bad Works… Dead Works

Recently I have been thinking about the five basic Christian doctrines identified in Hebrews 6.  According to the writer of Hebrews, they are those doctrines that Christians need to know before moving on to maturity.  You can find that post here.  The first one, that of repentance from dead works, struck me.  What has struck me is that it does not say that we are to repent of bad works or even evil works but of dead works. Could it bee that both our bad works and our good works are dead?

“The world today will try and convince you that these things are not obviously death producing but rather that some of them are only different alternatives in a more pluralistic culture.”

The first category of dead works I want to call the obvious dead works.  Paul, writing to the Galatians identifies these obvious works, “…the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God (Gal 5:19-21).”  The world today will try and convince you that these things are not obviously death producing but instead they would convince you that some of them are only different alternatives in a more pluralistic, tolerant, and accommodating culture.  However, those of us who have been the victims of these works can attest to the injustice that these works produce; broken marriages, the trauma of a sexual encounter in the absence of or inability to consent, the family neglect of alcoholism and drug abuse, the physical and psychological abuse of an angry spouse or parent just to name a few.  If you love a person who has been the victim of any of these dead works and the injustices that they are, then you know what it is to demand justice and the very visceral rightness of the justice demanded.  These works produce death in that the justice warranted for them is the death they deserve!  But we also know that we too are guilty, if only in our hearts, of at least one of these listed works.

James writes how, “…each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire.  Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin, and sin when it is fully grown brings forth death (Jas 1:14-15).”  It starts with our own evil desires.  It is our own lust that leads to sexual immorality, it is our own selfish desires for control that lead to idolatry, sorcery, enmity, and strife, and it is our own covetousness that leads to jealousy etc. and etc.  And when we act on those desires, we commit sin.

All sins are feelings or transgressions against something forbidden or required.  It is an offense against that for which something was created, and you were not created to be immoral, impure, nor any of the things listed above.  You were created for righteousness. And so, in not living out that which the creator has intended not only have we committed injustices against others, but we have committed injustices against ourselves and He who created us.  Our works were all birthed by our own desires and will bring forth death.

“The idea that any of our good works is sufficient to make amends for our bad works is not theologically or philosophically sound.”

But there is another kind of dead work.  And these dead works do not look as though they would produce death.  The quintessential example is that model prisoner, sentenced to a life of imprisonment, who builds a library that educates fellow inmates in order that they can build a good life when they are released.  Hundreds and then thousands of fellow inmates are impacted by their education for the better until one day someone makes the argument that the model inmates’ sentence should be commuted because of all the good that he has done since he was imprisoned.  But what if the person he had killed were your son or the woman he had raped were your daughter?  How many people would have to be helped before justice was served?  Ten, one hundred, one thousand?  How many lives would have to be saved before your son were returned?

The idea that any of our good works is sufficient to make amends for our bad works is not theologically or philosophically sound.  Even less so when we take into consideration that we were expected to be good and righteous by the one who created us and the very fact that we are not is a sin against that creator.  Can being what you were supposed to be amend for the fact that you once were not?  Could you make an argument that your works are good enough that you should not be judged for the works that were not good enough?  This was the error of the Pharisees in the time of Jesus.

“The Law was teaching them that righteousness cannot be found as an earned payment for legalistic works.”

David Stern writing about the Israelites of Jesus time argues that although they were pursuing the righteousness of The Law they missed that The Law was teaching them that righteousness cannot be found as an earned payment for legalistic works (Stern 1992, Rom 9:31).  J. Scott states plainly that, “both Intertestamental and Rabbinic Judaism were legalistic in nature, that they sought to earn or merit salvation by meticulous observance of the law (Scott 1995, 273-274).”  Are you trying to earn your righteousness, or do you mistakenly believe that you have already earned it?

We all know someone or some family of “good” people. They work hard, they don’t steal, and they are kind to one another. They may even go to church. But can any of this recover for them that which was lost in the fall? Do all of these good works when combined overcome the requirement for justice demanded by one evil deed or even one evil thought? The Bible teaches that the answer is a resounding no.

What is left then is to wonder, “are there any works that produce life?”  And the miracle of all miracles is that the answer is yes!!!  The work that Jesus completed on the cross is the only work that could and does produce life.  All our works produced and produce death and those deaths were paid for by the perfect sacrifice of Jesus on the cross.  The justice demanded for each of our dead works was paid, in full, by the very one who that justice is owed!  When you accept this work, you are brought out of your dead works and in freedom you are then able to serve one another through love (Gal 5:13).  That service will either encourage believers to persevere in their faith or cause unbelievers to accept Jesus’ work in faith.  Both of which are works of service that, through the work of Jesus, continue to produce life.

“We are to accept that our evil deeds, those that most obviously produce death, require justice.”

Finally, what does it mean then to repent from our dead works?  It means that we are to change our mind about righteousness.  We are to accept that our evil deeds, those that most obviously produce death, require justice; justice that is owed to our creator.  In our pride we decided that we new better what we were created for than He, and so we made ourselves into that which we were not intended to be.  We were intended to be righteous before God.  And in that lost righteousness we must also accept that we cannot generate our own righteousness or cover our own unrighteousness by our own “good” works.  Our “good” works are also dead.  Because we have offended against God.

Repent!  Accept Jesus work on your behalf by faith and start working to produce life in obedience to Him.  That is what it means to move on to maturity in Christ.

Thanks for reading and do not forget to subscribe to my e-mail below.  I am working on some great things and I would hate for you to miss out.

Photo by Wendy Scofield on Unsplash


Scott, J. Julius. Jewish Backgrounds Of The New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1995.

Stern, David H. Jewish New Testament Commentary. Clarksville: Jewish New Testament Publications, Inc., 1992.

Find these resources in the Faith, Hope, Love (Life) Store


Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

The Priority of Our Questions

             I have been reading a lot of posts lately by Christians in Christian groups on Facebook.  Great questions, and I am a firm believer that after the fear of the Lord it is our questions that lead us to wisdom.  A good question framed properly where the answer is diligently sought will always lead to a piece of knowledge that will augment our faith.  But we have also heard that there is not such thing as a dumb question, and I am not entirely convinced of the truth of that statement.

             Have you ever been in a conversation in which someone asked a question and although they were earnest in their desire for the answer the fact that they asked the question only revealed that the person still had much to learn?  I was sitting in my police car with a high school student who was taking advantage of our ride along program when he asked a question about how the radar worked.  We, as police officers, must be able to answer that question often as part of our testimony in court to demonstrate that we know how to correctly employ the device.  After about twenty minutes of explanation the young man pointed to a parked car and asked, “wouldn’t it be cool if the radar could detect that car?”  While it was clear that he genuinely wanted it to “be cool” he had not heard or maybe he had not understood, anything I had said in the previous twenty minutes about the functioning and purpose of the radar. A proper understanding would have alleviated the necessity of the question.

These are the kind of questions I have been seeing in the Christian Facebook posts.  Can god fix any kind of relationship; …even when it seems hopeless, can he restore it?  Is it okay for a Christian to listen to non-Christian music?  Is it normal to get sick and angry when people blaspheme the name of God?  All questions that need to be answered but all questions that may reveal that we do not have a firm grasp of the basics of Christianity.

“What would Paul have considered the basics of Christianity and would a proper understanding of these basics answer some of our other initial questions?”

I was reminded of a passage in which Paul told the Corinthians, “I fed you with milk, not solid food, for you were not ready for it (1Co 3:2).”  What is the milk that we need before we are given solid food?  What would Paul have considered the basics of Christianity and would a proper understanding of these basics answer some of our other initial questions?

             Where Paul was telling the Corinthians that they are not yet ready for solid food the writer of Hebrews expressed to the Hebrews that they were ready and that they needed to move off the elementary doctrines.  Here, I think the writer identifies what those elementary doctrines might be.  Therefore let us leave the elementary doctrine of Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, and of instruction about washings, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment.  And this we will do if God permits (Heb 6:1-3).”  I suspect that the elementary doctrines are the doctrine of repentance from dead works, the doctrine of faith in God, the doctrine of washings, the doctrine of laying on of hands, the doctrine of resurrection from the dead, and the doctrine of eternal judgment.

             Could you explain those doctrines to a new believer?  Do you understand each of these doctrines enough to use them to answer those other basic questions?  I suspect that the answers to the earlier question about repaired relationships could be found or at least better understood through an understanding of the doctrine of faith and resurrection.  I suspect that questions about what is appropriate and what is not appropriate for Christian behavior could be best deciphered through an understanding of the doctrine of dead works.  What produces life versus that which produces death?  Anger could also be better understood in a context of the doctrines of dead works and even eternal judgment.

“Where can we go to learn these things if we are not learning them in the church?  What hope do we have apart from these basic doctrines?”

             I guess what I am saying is that my experiences on Facebook in these Christian groups is that the church, and I include myself in that body, is failing to communicate and teach these basic doctrines.  Where can we go to learn these things if we are not learning them in the church?  What hope do we have apart from these basic doctrines?  Every question, asked earnestly, is a good question but what are the most important questions?  The priority for us as Christians should be those doctrines listed above.  If we cannot answer those questions then we don’t know the basics of our identity in Christ, we can’t communicate those basics to others, and as a generation of believers we can’t hope to move on to maturity. The good news is that the answers to these questions are not restricted to those in possession of a theology degree. If anything my theology education has only made me more confident in that which I already knew.

What does it mean to repent from dead works?

What does it mean to put your faith in God?

What does the bible teach about washings?

Why and when do we lay on of hands?

What does the Bible say about the resurrection of the dead?

What is the Biblical teaching on eternal judgment?

“To be a Christian is to know what Christ taught on these basic doctrines.”

             One final thought.  Adam Clarke writing on the passage in Hebrews that I cited above says that he is, “inclined to think that all the terms in this verse, as well as those in the former, belong to the Levitical law, and are to be explained on that ground (Clarke 1810-1826, Heb 6).”  It is not enough to know what you feel these things mean.  To know the answers to these questions we have to know what they are as Jesus and the Disciples would have understood them to be.  To be a Christian is to know what Christ taught on these basic doctrines.

Thanks for reading and do not forget to subscribe to my e-mail below.  I am working on some great things and I would hate for you to miss out.


Clarke, Adam. Adam Clarke’s Commentary On The Bible. Public Domain, 1810-1826.

Find this resource at the Faith, Hope, Love (Life) Store


Processing…
Success! You're on the list.